The tame 2-quotient factoring + the B10′ orientation package #
The nuT-factoring brick of the analytic-hunram derivation (docs/orchestration/p15f2c2c-handoff.md
§half-(B) step 4). Three pieces:
(i) τ-death in 2-groups (pure finite group theory, axiom-free): any group hom
φ : Ttame →* Qinto a finite2-groupQkillstameTau—φ tameTau = 1. From the pushed tame relation(φ σ)⁻¹ (φ τ) (φ σ) = (φ τ)²,Tame.tame_odd_ordergivesorderOf (φ τ)odd; in a2-group it is a power of2; odd ∧2-power ⟹1.(ii) the factoring (axiom-free): any continuous
φ : Ttame → Qinto a finite discrete2-group factors throughnuT : Ttame → Ztwo(the pro-2tame character).(iii)
TameUnitOrientation(std-3 + B10′): the B10′-clause shape, plus its discharge at the axiom witnessboundaryMapsWitness.tameF.
Parts (i) and (ii) are std-3; part (iii) uses B10′.
(i) τ-death in a finite 2-group #
τ-death (the Lemma 6.17 vanishing proof(i)): a group hom from T_tame into a finite 2-group kills the
tame generator τ. The tame relation σ⁻¹ τ σ = τ² pushes to Q, so Tame.tame_odd_order
makes orderOf (φ τ) odd; in the 2-group Q it is a power of 2; the only odd power of
2 is 1, so φ τ = 1. Pure finite group theory — no topology, no axiom.
(ii) the factoring: continuous homs into a pro-2 group factor through nuT #
Both nuT and any continuous hom into a pro-2 group factor through the maximal pro-2 quotient
T_tame(2); and nuT induces there an isomorphism (its kernel is exactly the pro-2 kernel:
ker nuT ≤ proPKernel 2 T_tame). Composing with proPKernel_le_ker gives the factoring.
τ dies in the maximal pro-2 quotient T_tame(2): maxProPMk 2 T_tame τ = 1. By part (i)
map_tameTau_eq_one, τ lands in every open normal U with a 2-group quotient, hence in the
pro-2 kernel.
ker ν_t ≤ proPKernel 2 T_tame: maxProPMk : T_tame ↠ T_tame(2) factors through
ν_t : T_tame ↠ ℤ₂. Build ρ' : ℤ₂ → T_tame(2) from the ẑ-power hom ẑ ↦ (maxProPMk σ)^ẑ
(descended through ℤ₂ = ẑ(2), the target being pro-2), matching maxProPMk on σ and (via
maxProPMk_tameTau) on τ; density on {σ, τ} gives maxProPMk = ρ' ∘ ν_t, so
ν_t x = 1 ⟹ maxProPMk x = 1 ⟹ x ∈ proPKernel.
The factoring (the Lemma 6.17 vanishing proof(ii)): a continuous hom φ : T_tame → Q into a pro-2 group
kills everything ν_t kills — ν_t x = 1 ⟹ φ x = 1. (ker ν_t ≤ proPKernel 2 T_tame ≤ ker φ,
the second inclusion by proPKernel_le_ker.)
The factoring, finite discrete 2-group form — the shape the c2c4 unit-image argument
consumes (Q = the 2-part quotient of Gal(F₀/ℚ₂)).
(iii) the B10′ orientation clause #
TameUnitOrientation (the Lemma 6.17 vanishing proof(iii)): the B10′ orientation clause for an arbitrary tame
coordinate tameF : G_ℚ₂ → T_tame — every local-reciprocity image of a 2-adic unit is killed
by ν_t ∘ tameF. For the axiom bundle's own tame coordinate this is OrientedTameQuotient's
nuT_recip_unit; a general B : BoundaryMaps carries no reciprocity clause, so the moved
lemma_6_17_vanish threads TameUnitOrientation localReciprocity B.tameF as one hypothesis
(the hc/hV2 precedent), discharged at boundaryMapsWitness.
Equations
- GQ2.TameUnitOrientation R tameF = ∀ (u : ℤ_[2]ˣ) (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), GQ2.toAb g = R.recip (GQ2.unitEmbed u) → GQ2.nuT (tameF g) = 1