Proposition 3.2 — proofs #
Proves the §3 statements for the paper's Prop. 3.2 (common tame quotient) and the two
ν-surjectivities of Prop. 3.14. The theorems are declared here, in the same
GQ2.SectionThree namespace, because their proofs import the definition layer in
GQ2/SectionThree.lean.
Γ_Aside (prop_3_2_gammaA, axiom-free): the classifierF₄ → T_tame(σ↦σ, τ↦τ, x₀,x₁↦1) killsN_A— through every finite level the pushed marking(σ̄, τ̄, 1, 1)is admissible, becauseτ̄has odd order (Lemma 3.1,GQ2/Tame.lean), soω₂kills it and the whole eq. (1)–(3) word ledger collapses (u_i = d₀ = c₀ = d_g = h_c = h₀ = 1), making relation (6) trivially true — exactly the paper's proof. Descending and inverting via the presentation universal property gives the marked isomorphismΓ_A/W_A ≅ T_tame; the two composites are the identity by density of the marked generators.ν-surjectivities (nuT_surjective,nuTwo_surjective, axiom-free): the ranges are closed subgroups (continuous images of compact groups) containingν(σ) = 1, and1topologically generatesZ₂(viaℤdense inℤ̂, the profinite-exponentiation API).- Local side (
prop_3_2_local,Ax = B10): the axiomGQ2.tameQuotientsupplies the closed normal pro-2WwithG_{ℚ₂}/W ≅ T_tame; Lemma 3.3's maximality is proved —T_tamehas no nontrivial "normal subgroup with 2-group finite images", by the paper's argument: through each Fermat-level quotientC_{2^{2^m}−1} ⋊ C_{2^m}(faithful squaring action, trivial center) the image is central hence trivial, so theẐ-coordinate of such a subgroup is infinitely 2-divisible; the inertia part then dies levelwise (odd ∧ 2-power).
Infrastructure (all axiom-free): topological generation of free profinite groups by their
generators (also proved by the finite-generation proof's GQ2/FinitelyGenerated.lean in IsTopologicallyFinGen
packaging; the overlap is one lemma deep and flagged for dedup), its transfer along
continuous surjections and into finite quotients, and equality-on-topological-generators for
continuous homomorphisms.
Topological generation: free profinite groups and their quotients #
Set.range of a Fin 2-tuple is the unordered pair.
The free profinite group is topologically generated by its generators (the discrete free
group is dense in its profinite completion). Cf. the finite-generation proof's GQ2/FinitelyGenerated.lean for the
same fact in IsTopologicallyFinGen packaging.
Topological generation transfers along a continuous surjective homomorphism.
In a discrete (e.g. finite) group, topological generation is plain generation.
Two continuous homomorphisms agreeing on a topologically generating set agree everywhere.
Marked topological generation of T_tame and its finite levels #
T_tame is topologically generated by σ, τ.
In every discrete continuous quotient of T_tame, the images of σ, τ generate.
The word-ledger collapse #
Paper, proofs of Prop. 3.2 / Prop. 3.10: at a marking with trivial wild letters and
odd-order τ, the ω₂-exponent kills τ-words and the auxiliary words (1)–(3) all
collapse to 1, so relation (6) holds trivially.
x^{ω₂} = 1 for an element of odd order (the 2-primary part of an odd-order element).
The Γ_A side: the classifier and its levels #
The classifier F₄ ⟶ T_tame: σ ↦ σ, τ ↦ τ, x₀ ↦ 1, x₁ ↦ 1.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.tameClassifier = (GQ2.FreeProfiniteGroup.homEquiv (Fin 4) GQ2.Ttame).symm ![GQ2.tameSigma, GQ2.tameTau, 1, 1]
Instances For
Through every open normal level of T_tame, the marking pushed from the classifier is
admissible: τ̄ has odd order (Lemma 3.1), so the ledger collapses.
The descent Γ_A → T_tame and its inverse #
The tame relator of the universal marking lies in N_A (it dies in every admissible
quotient — relation (5) is part of admissibility). Also proved by the admissible-limit proof's
GQ2/AdmissibleLimit.lean; kept inline for import hygiene, flagged for dedup.
N_A is contained in the kernel of the classifier F₄ → T_tame (each of its finite
levels is an admissible quotient, by isAdmissible_tameClassifier_level).
The ↥Γ_A-spelled copy of wildPart (definitionally equal; the admissible-limit layer spells
wildPart at the raw quotient F₄ ⧸ N_A, but this file's constructions all run at the
bundled-carrier spelling ↥Γ_A, where the ProfiniteGrp instance path applies uniformly).
Instances For
The descent φ_A : Γ_A → T_tame of the classifier (σ↦σ, τ↦τ, x₀,x₁↦1).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.phiA = GQ2.quotientLift GQ2.NA (ProfiniteGrp.Hom.hom GQ2.SectionThree.tameClassifier) GQ2.SectionThree.NA_le_ker_tameClassifier
Instances For
W_A ≤ ker φ_A (the wild generators map to 1, and the kernel is closed normal).
ψ : Γ_A/W_A → T_tame, the descent of φ_A.
Equations
Instances For
Γ_A/W_A as a profinite group (for the universal property of T_tame's presentation).
Instances For
The base map F₂ ⟶ Γ_A/W_A: σ ↦ σ̄, τ ↦ τ̄.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The base map kills the tame relator: its image is the W_A-class of the Γ_A-image of
univMarking.tameRelator ∈ N_A.
χ : T_tame → Γ_A/W_A, by the universal property of the presentation.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.chiW = GQ2.presentationLift {GQ2.tameWord} (ProfiniteGrp.Hom.hom GQ2.SectionThree.chiBase) ⋯
Instances For
Γ_A/W_A is topologically generated by the classes of the four marked generators.
ψ ∘ χ = id on T_tame (both send σ ↦ σ, τ ↦ τ; density).
The marked isomorphism Γ_A/W_A ≅ T_tame (Prop. 3.2, Γ_A side).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Prop. 3.2, Γ_A side: the quotient of Γ_A by W_A is T_tame,
matching the marked generators.
The ν-surjectivities of Prop. 3.14 #
ℤ̂ is topologically generated by 1.
Z₂ is topologically generated by ztwoOne.
A continuous homomorphism from a compact group hitting a topological generator of a T2
target is surjective.
ν_t : T_tame ↠ Z₂ is surjective (Prop. 3.14's arrow).
nuT is qualified GQ2.nuT (the BoundaryFrame Ttame → Z₂ map) to disambiguate from the
later SectionThree.nuT (the ν_ur descent through (G_ℚ₂(2))^ab, a different map) which
otherwise shadows it in this namespace.
ν₂ : Π ↠ Z₂ is surjective (eq. (21)'s arrow).
Pro-2 subgroups have 2-group finite images #
A closed-subgroup-free transfer: if N ≤ P is pro-2 (as a topological group) then its
image under any continuous homomorphism to a finite discrete group is a 2-group.
The inertia quotient Q = T_tame / ⟨⟨τ⟩⟩ #
The closed normal closure of τ in T_tame — the (pro-odd) tame inertia.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.inertiaPart = (Subgroup.normalClosure {GQ2.tameTau}).topologicalClosure
Instances For
Q = T_tame / ⟨⟨τ⟩⟩, the procyclic unramified quotient.
Instances For
The projection T_tame → Q, typed at the bundled carrier.
Instances For
The image of σ in Q.
Instances For
closure {a, 1} = closure {a}.
Q is topologically generated by σ.
The Fermat levels G_m = C_{2^{2^m}−1} ⋊ C_{2^m} #
The paper's proof of Lemma 3.3: the finite quotients of T_tame in which geometric
Frobenius has order exactly 2^m on inertia of order e_m = 2^{2^m} − 1 (the squaring
action is faithful, since the order of 2 mod e_m is exactly 2^m). Their centers are
trivial, so normal 2-subgroups die; this pins the Ẑ-coordinate of a pro-2 normal subgroup
to be divisible by every 2^m.
The order of 2 mod e_m is exactly 2^m, in the only form needed: no smaller power of
the unit 2 is 1.
Units of ZMod e, acting as automorphisms of the multiplicative cyclic group of order
e (the vehicle for the squaring action of Frobenius on inertia).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.unitsMulAut e = { toFun := fun (u : (ZMod e)ˣ) => AddEquiv.toMultiplicative (DistribMulAction.toAddEquiv (ZMod e) u), map_one' := ⋯, map_mul' := ⋯ }
Instances For
The character C_{2^m} → (ℤ/e_m)ˣ sending the generator to 2⁻¹ (the inverse
squaring, so that s⁻¹ t s = t² holds with the paper's conjugation convention).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.uChar m = { toFun := fun (h : Multiplicative (ZMod (2 ^ m))) => (GQ2.SectionThree.u2 m)⁻¹ ^ (Multiplicative.toAdd h).val, map_one' := ⋯, map_mul' := ⋯ }
Instances For
The Frobenius action φ_m : C_{2^m} → Aut(C_{e_m}).
Equations
Instances For
The Fermat level G_m = C_{e_m} ⋊ C_{2^m} with (inverse-)squaring action.
(An abbrev, so all SemidirectProduct instances apply without wrapper friction.)
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.GFermat m = (Multiplicative (ZMod (GQ2.SectionThree.emN m)) ⋊[GQ2.SectionThree.phiFermat m] Multiplicative (ZMod (2 ^ m)))
Instances For
Equations
s ∈ G_m: the Frobenius generator.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.sFermat m = SemidirectProduct.inr (Multiplicative.ofAdd 1)
Instances For
t ∈ G_m: the inertia generator.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.tFermat m = SemidirectProduct.inl (Multiplicative.ofAdd 1)
Instances For
G_m is generated by s, t.
The center of G_m is trivial (the action is faithful and fixed-point-free on the
generator).
The classifying map F₂ ⟶ G_m (σ ↦ s, τ ↦ t).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.fermatBase m = (GQ2.FreeProfiniteGroup.homEquiv (Fin 2) (ProfiniteGrp.of (GQ2.SectionThree.GFermat m))).symm ![GQ2.SectionThree.sFermat m, GQ2.SectionThree.tFermat m]
Instances For
The marked map T_tame → G_m (σ ↦ s, τ ↦ t).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.fermatHom m = GQ2.presentationLift {GQ2.tameWord} (ProfiniteGrp.Hom.hom (GQ2.SectionThree.fermatBase m)) ⋯
Instances For
Elements of a normal subgroup with 2-group finite images die in every Fermat level (the image is a central 2-subgroup of a center-free group).
Every element of Multiplicative (ℤ/n) is a power of ofAdd 1.
The unramified coordinate at level m: ν_m = rightHom ∘ (T_tame → G_m).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionThree.fermatNu m = { toMonoidHom := SemidirectProduct.rightHom.comp (GQ2.SectionThree.fermatHom m).toMonoidHom, continuous_toFun := ⋯ }
Instances For
The level maps ψ_m : Q → C_{2^m} descend from ν_m.
Equations
Instances For
Cyclic-group torsion helper #
In a finite cyclic group, an element whose order divides #K lies in K (the subgroup
of order #K is exactly the #K-torsion, by the cyclic root-count bound).
Lemma 3.3, core form #
Lemma 3.3 (core): a normal subgroup of T_tame all of whose finite continuous images
are 2-groups is trivial. Paper argument: through each Fermat level G_m the image is a
central 2-subgroup of a center-free group, hence trivial, so the Q-coordinate dies in every
C_{2^m}; the cyclic level-comparison then kills the Q-image entirely, and the remaining
inertia part has both odd and 2-power order levelwise.
Proposition 3.2, local side #
Lemma 3.3's maximality, for any B10 datum (extracted from prop_3_2_local's proof
so the marked pro-2 isomorphisms oriented witness can reuse it): every closed normal pro-2 subgroup lies in T.W
(eq_bot_of_normal_two_images applied to the image of the competitor N in T_tame).
Prop. 3.2, local side (Ax = B10): the tame quotient of
G_{ℚ₂} is T_tame, by the maximal closed normal pro-2 subgroup. Existence is axiom B10
(oriented form B10′ since the marked pro-2 isomorphisms; only the underlying TameQuotientData is used here);
maximality is Lemma 3.3 (tameData_maximal).
Paper-tag ledger (auto-generated by paperforge; do not edit) #
- eq. (1) = ⟦eq-defwords⟧
- eq. (21) = ⟦eq-nu2⟧
- eq. (3) = ⟦eq-defwords3⟧
- Lemma 3.1 = ⟦lem-tamefinite⟧
- Lemma 3.3 = ⟦lem-o2tame⟧
- Prop 3.10 = ⟦prop-pro2⟧
- Prop 3.14 = ⟦prop-compatiblemarking⟧
- Prop 3.2 = ⟦prop-tamequotient⟧