B10: the tame quotient of G_ℚ₂ — definition layer #
The paper's Prop. 3.2 needs, on the local side, the classical description of the tame
quotient of a local absolute Galois group: there is a closed normal pro-2 subgroup
W_F ≤ G_{ℚ₂} (wild inertia) with
G_{ℚ₂}/W_F ≅ T_tame = ⟨σ, τ ∣ τ^σ = τ²⟩_prof.
This is a literature leaf on a par with B1/B4 — NSW [1], Ch. VII §7.5, Theorem (7.5.3)
(Iwasawa): the Galois group of the maximal tamely ramified extension of a local field k
is the profinite group on two generators σ, τ with the single relation στσ⁻¹ = τ^q
(q = #κ = 2 here); together with (7.5.2) (the split extension 1 → Ẑ^{(p′)}(1) → G_k → Γ → 1) and the standard fact that G(k̄|k_tr) = W_F is pro-p (ramification theory; Serre,
Local Fields [7], Ch. IV). It was not in the step-1 census (which is otherwise
2-centric); it enters now as axiom B10 (GQ2.tameQuotient, in
GQ2/Foundations/Axioms.lean).
Conventions #
Ttame,tameSigma,tameTauare defined inGQ2/BoundaryFrame.lean— the presented profinite group onσ = of 0,τ = of 1with relatortameWord = τ^σ·(τ²)⁻¹, wherex ^ g = g⁻¹xg(conjP) and the paper'sσis geometric Frobenius ("geometric Frobenius acts by squaring", Prop. 3.2's proof). NSW's (7.5.3) is stated with arithmeticσacting on the left (στσ⁻¹ = τ^q); the two presentations agree underσ ↦ σ⁻¹, which is an automorphism of the free profinite group carrying either relator to a conjugate of the other's inverse — same closed normal closure, same presented group.- Deviation (as in
LocalTameQuotient,GQ2/SectionThree.lean): Mathlib has no ramification theory, so the bundle does not say "wild inertia"; it asserts a closed normal pro-2Wwith tame quotientT_tame. By paper Lemma 3.3 (O₂(G_{ℚ₂}) = W_F) such aWis unique — but maximality is not part of the axiom: it is Lemma 3.3's proved content (pure profinite group theory ofT_tame, from Lemma 3.1's finite analysis), and stays a theorem obligation (Prop. 3.2; consumed byprop_3_2_local, whichextendsthis bundle with the maximality field).
The normal field is an instance-binder so that the equiv field's quotient AbsGalQ2 ⧸ W
elaborates (same device as LocalTameQuotient).
B10 (tame quotient of G_ℚ₂), the bundle. A closed normal pro-2 subgroup
W ≤ G_{ℚ₂} (wild inertia, encoded intrinsically — see the module docstring) together with
a continuous isomorphism G_{ℚ₂}/W ≅ T_tame.
Citation: NSW [1] (7.5.3) (Iwasawa) with (7.5.2); Serre Local Fields [7] Ch. IV
(wild inertia is pro-p). Paper: Prop. 3.2, local side ("the standard description of the
tame quotient in the geometric normalization"). The axiom GQ2.tameQuotient lives in
GQ2/Foundations/Axioms.lean.
- W : Subgroup AbsGalQ2
The wild subgroup
W_F ≤ G_{ℚ₂}. - normal : self.W.Normal
W_Fis normal. - isClosed : IsClosed ↑self.W
W_Fis closed. W_Fis pro-2.The tame quotient:
G_{ℚ₂}/W_F ≅ T_tame.
Instances For
B10′ (oriented tame quotient), the bundle. A B10 tame-quotient datum whose unramified
coordinate ν_t ∘ equiv ∘ mk is compatible with local reciprocity (a bundle R, pinned to
the B5 axiom at the axiom use-site): units land in the ν_t-kernel, and the uniformizer —
rec(2) = arithmetic Frobenius — lands in the geometric-Frobenius coordinate ztwoOne⁻¹
(the repo's tameSigma is geometric Frobenius: tame_relation reads σ⁻¹τσ = τ², so σ
is NSW (7.5.3)'s σ⁻¹).
Both clauses read the value through an arbitrary lift g of the abelianized class (well-posed:
ν_t ∘ equiv ∘ mk kills commClosure — continuous into an abelian T2 target).
Citation: Serre, Local Fields, Ch. XIII §4, Proposition 13 and its corollary — local
reciprocity maps the unit group onto inertia; hence a uniformizer maps to a Frobenius lift.
For the higher unit filtration, Neukirch, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. V, Theorem (6.2)
maps U_K^{(n)} onto G^n(L|K) for n > 0 (it should not be cited for the n = 0 clause).
For unramified norm-triviality use Neukirch Ch. V (1.2), equivalently NSW [1] (7.1.2)(i).
Tame structure and orientation: NSW [1] (7.5.2)/(7.5.3). Verified against the cited PDFs;
the audit copies are not vendored in this repository.
- nuT_recip_unit (u : ℤ_[2]ˣ) (g : AbsGalQ2) : toAb g = R.recip (unitEmbed u) → nuT (self.equiv ↑g) = 1
Units are unramified-trivial:
ν_t(tameF(rec(u))) = 1for every 2-adic unitu. - nuT_recip_uniformizer (g : AbsGalQ2) : toAb g = R.recip uniformizer → nuT (self.equiv ↑g) = ztwoOne⁻¹
The uniformizer lands in the geometric-Frobenius coordinate:
ν_t(tameF(rec(2))) = ztwoOne⁻¹.
Instances For
Paper-tag ledger (auto-generated by paperforge; do not edit) #
- Lemma 3.1 = ⟦lem-tamefinite⟧
- Lemma 3.3 = ⟦lem-o2tame⟧
- Prop 3.2 = ⟦prop-tamequotient⟧