Admissibility is preserved by quotient maps (paper §2, Lemmas 2.1–2.2) #
The paper builds the candidate Γ_A as an inverse limit of admissible finite quotients, which
requires that admissibility is stable under the maps of the system. The technical heart is that
the auxiliary words (which involve ω₂-powers) commute with group homomorphisms — this is exactly
GQ2.powOmega2_map. Here we push it through the whole word ledger to obtain:
GQ2.Marking.map_admissible: an admissible marking ofGpushes forward, along any surjective group homomorphismf : G → H(of finite groups), to an admissible marking ofH.
theorem
GQ2.Marking.map_wildLHS
{G : Type u_1}
{H : Type u_2}
[Group G]
[Group H]
[Finite G]
(f : G →* H)
(t : Marking G)
:
The wild relator word commutes with any group hom f.
theorem
GQ2.Marking.map_admissible
{G : Type u_3}
{H : Type u_4}
[Group G]
[Group H]
[Finite G]
[Finite H]
(f : G →* H)
(hf : Function.Surjective ⇑f)
(t : Marking G)
(ht : t.Admissible)
:
(map f t).Admissible
Admissibility pushes forward along surjective quotient maps (paper §2, cofinality /
Lemma 2.1–2.2). If t is an admissible marking of a finite group G and f : G ↠ H is a
surjective homomorphism of finite groups, then t.map f is an admissible marking of H.
Paper-tag ledger (auto-generated by paperforge; do not edit) #
- Lemma 2.1 = ⟦lem-subdirect⟧