§1 The T-layer reading toolkit (the tIn-bridge inverted) #
tIn : T → B (TransgressionUnit) lands in tChild and is injective with
image exactly tChild (through the mChildEquiv-bridge); its
conjugation law covers sec7ActOnTHom. These are the tools that read
the tau-defects back into T for the eT-slot.
tIn is normalized: tIn 0 = 1.
tIn is additive-to-multiplicative.
tIn is injective (mChildDescend is bijective).
tIn covers tChild (the bridge inverted on the radical layer).
Conjugation transport across the T-bridge: conjugating tIn t
by an ambient class-representative acts by sec7ActOnTHom at the
C-class — the vInG_conj compatibility one layer down (through
mChildEquiv_conjOnMgrp + towerActM_mk).
§2 The tau-layer over a multiplicative section of btProj #
Everything here is generic over an abstract section
s : C → B/T' with s 1 = 1, s-multiplicativity, and the section
property — instantiated at csecSec in the main theorem.
The 1-pinned B-representative choice over a section of btProj
(the readSecAmb-style choice at the child, design §4-N10).
Instances For
The tau-defect dies in T' (multiplicativity of s).
The lem:affinelifting zero-section pullback read: the
T-element carried by the tau-defect.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.pinET chief K s hs1 hsmul c d = ⋯.choose
Instances For
The tau_eT-pinning shape: tau c · tau d = tIn (e_T c d) · tau (cd).
Conjugation by tau a covers sec7ActOnTHom a on tIn-images (the
section property identifies the ambient class of any representative).
The twisted Z²(C,T)-law of the tau-defect read (the bundle's
eT_cocycle-slot): pure factor-set algebra plus pinTau_conj.
§3 The deck coordinate pinDeck (the λ-pinned ZMod 2 ≅ deck) #
The order-2 central deck of the descended cover, parameterized by its
𝔽₂-coordinate: the correction currency of the ℓ̂-renormalization.
The unique nontrivial deck element (card_descKernel_eq_two).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.pinDeckElt chief K lam hinv D hW hne = Exists.choose ⋯
Instances For
The deck element with a prescribed 𝔽₂-reading.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.pinDeck chief K lam hinv D hW hne r = if r = 0 then 1 else ↑(Q2Presentation.Induction.pinDeckElt chief K lam hinv D hW hne)
Instances For
The deck coordinate is self-inverse (order-2 kernel).
The deck coordinate is central (elementwise descKernel_le_center).
The deck coordinate dies under the cover map.
§4 The section-defect reading pinDelta (the δ_κ-slot) #
Generic over an abstract lift σ̂; the pinning's sec_read holds by
rfl because the bundle's deltaK IS this reading.
The deck reading of the σ̂-defect (eq:descendedclass's pure base
part, inf δ_κ).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.pinDelta chief K lam hinv D hW shat c d = Q2Presentation.Induction.descRead chief K lam hinv D hW (shat c * shat d * (shat (c * d))⁻¹)
Instances For
The factor-set 2-cocycle law of the section-defect reading (deck
centrality + descRead-additivity; the multiplicative mirror of the
green gRead_cocycle).
§5 The renormalized fibre lift ℓ̂ = pinEll #
ellR corrected by the deck coordinate of a quadratic refinement k of
gRead + edgeBaseFactor: the ONE budgeted exists_quadRefinement pass
(design §4-N10), after which the fibre reading IS edgeBaseFactor.
The corrected fibre lift ℓ̂(v) := ℓ(v) · z(k v).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.pinEll chief K lam hinv D hW hne k v = Q2Presentation.Induction.ellR chief K lam hinv D hW v * Q2Presentation.Induction.pinDeck chief K lam hinv D hW hne (k v)
Instances For
The ℓ̂-defect is the ℓ-defect times the three deck coordinates
(centrality + self-inverseness of the deck).
The ℓ̂-defect dies in the deck (fib_mem-slot).
The renormalized fibre reading IS edgeBaseFactor (fib_read-
slot): the deck shift contributes the coboundary ∂k = gRead + f.
§6 The conjugation defect at ℓ̂ (the conj_*-slots) #
The ℓ̂-conjugation defect dies in the deck (conj_mem-slot).
The ℓ̂-conjugation defect is the ℓ-conjugation defect times two
deck coordinates.
The ℓ̂-conjugation reading in nRead-coordinates: the deck
shift contributes k v + k (c·v).
§7 The exit: pinned existence on the branch #
N10 headline — the PINNED zero-edge bundle exists (keep 3's
∃-load (i) discharged): given ZeroEdge and the base model
(lem:basedetclass, P6-owned; the §15 TransgressionReading is already
theorem-backed), there is a bundle Z together with a ZeroEdgePinning
— every cochain slot of Z is an ACTUAL deck read of the descended
cover descTarget D hW in the Csec-coordinates (eq:descendedclass +
the lem:affinelifting zero-section pullback). Hypotheses, never
axioms.
The pinned bundle from the honest branch inputs, Nonempty-model
form: BaseModelExists consumed through its Prop-wrapper (same shape
as the green zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty_of_zeroEdge, upgraded to
PINNED existence).
The odd-image branch (lem:basedetclass's unramified clause,
fully in-tree): pinned existence with the base-model input DISCHARGED by
baseModelExists_of_oddHeadAction — the R4b pinned-existence chain is
hypothesis-free here beyond hne/hZ/hodd.