The B/T' framed pair and its V-layer #
The B/T'-child: the framed pair the descended cover covers
(lem:transgression's base, manuscript l.4032–4034; the quotient of the
child by the radical layer T').
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The V-layer of B/T': the image of M' (≅ V = M/T via the
tower collapses; the kernel of B/T' ↠ C).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.vLayer chief K = Subgroup.map (QuotientGroup.mk' (Q2Presentation.Induction.tChild chief K)) (Q2Presentation.Induction.mChild chief K)
Instances For
The C-child collapse as a hygiene def at the cChild carrier
(the banked mixed-defeq-carrier fix-class): B/M' ≃* C = Y/K. Only its
map_one/map_mul are consumed (the Delta transport laws).
Equations
Instances For
μ as a ℤ-value (eq:mumultiplicity, the target-side VALUE
|B¹(V)|·|Z¹(T)| = 2^d·2^{2·dimT+r} — P3-U2's muT; the per-source
realization of the count is the affine-lifting dissolution lane).
The head V = M/T: descended action and descended form #
The descended C-action on the head V = M/T (towerActM mod the
stable radical layer, via Submodule.mapQ).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.headActE chief K c = (Q2Presentation.Induction.towerT K).mapQ (Q2Presentation.Induction.towerT K) ↑((Q2Presentation.Induction.towerActM K) c) ⋯
Instances For
The λ-composed square family annihilates T (the proven crux clauses
q_λ|_T = 0, b_λ(T,M) = 0, through the invariance bridge; hinv is
consumed by the proof only — included so the signature carries the
uniform (chief K lam hinv hne) slot order of every call site).
The descended head form q̄_λ : QuadF2 (M/T) (prop:simpleheaddet
at the tower, the U1-aligned carrier of the R4b Gauss data).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeHeadForm chief K lam hinv hne = ⋯.descend
Instances For
q̄_λ is nonsingular (crux radical clause: polar radical = T).
The head is nontrivial (towerT_ne_top, hR-free) — the [Nontrivial V]
guard of the P6 Dickson pinning holds at the R4b head.
Polar equivariance in adjoint form: b(c·v, w) = b(v, c⁻¹·w).
The bilinear normalized factor set f of κ_q⁰ #
(eq:basekappacochain's fibre data, chosen BILINEAR via
Quadratic.polarization so the factor-set 2-cocycle law is automatic)
f: the bilinear factor set of the base determinant model —
f(v,v) = q̄(v), f(v,w) + f(w,v) = b_q̄(v,w) (hygiene def fixing the
FiniteDimensional instance path once).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeBaseFactor chief K lam hinv hne = Q2Presentation.Quadratic.polarization (Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeHeadForm chief K lam hinv hne)
Instances For
𝒳_T-side: the connecting cochain γ_χ = ∂^∨(χ) #
(concrete: extend χ along a fixed linear retraction onto T, take the
δ-difference, descend to V^∨; manuscript l.4085–4092)
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.instFintypeXTEdge chief K = Fintype.ofFinite ↥(Q2Presentation.Induction.XT chief K)
A fixed complement of T in M (data-fixing choice; 𝔽₂-linear
algebra).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeTCompl chief K = ⋯.choose
Instances For
The fixed linear retraction π_T : M → T (identity on T).
Equations
Instances For
The paired characterization of the data-fixing def (banked fix-class):
π_T restricts to the identity on T.
χ̃ = χ ∘ π_T : M^∨ — the retracted extension of χ ∈ 𝒳_T.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.chiTilde chief K chi = ↑chi ∘ₗ Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeTProj chief K
Instances For
χ ∈ 𝒳_T is invariant under the restricted action (elementwise form
of the mem_XT clause).
The δ(χ̃)-cochain on M: m ↦ χ̃(c⁻¹·m) + χ̃(m).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
δ(χ̃) kills T (stability of T + invariance of χ + char 2), so
it descends to V^∨.
γ_χ = ∂^∨(χ) ∈ V^∨, per c (manuscript l.4090–4092): the
descended δ(χ̃)-difference.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.gammaChi chief K chi c = (Q2Presentation.Induction.towerT K).liftQ (Q2Presentation.Induction.gammaChiRaw chief K chi c) ⋯
Instances For
Normalization: γ_χ(1) = 0.
The twisted Z¹(C, V^∨) law for γ_χ:
γ_χ(cd) = γ_χ(c) + c·γ_χ(d) with the dual action (c·φ)(v) = φ(c⁻¹·v).
The zero-edge descent bundle #
The zero-edge descent data (eq:descendedclass l.4037–4045 +
lem:affinelifting l.4048–4083, as one choice bundle — the §6.5 choice
discipline: both R4b keeps take the SAME bundle):
D/hW— the zero-edge witness (a normal edge complement, P3-U3); the bundle therefore impliesZeroEdge(ZeroEdgeDescentData.zeroEdge);Csec+hdisj/hsup— thelem:transgressionsplitting coordinatesB/T' = V ⋊ C(Cseca complement to theV-layer);gammaK/deltaK— the normalized decomposition dataγ_κ ∈ Z¹(C,V^∨),δ_κ ∈ Z²(C,𝔽₂)of the descended class, with concrete cocycle laws (dual action(c·φ)(v) = φ(c⁻¹·v));eT— thelem:affineliftingclasse ∈ Z²(C,T)(pullback ofB → V⋊Calong the zero section), twisted cocycle law in thehzc-ready orientation;mC— the equivariant-lift correction functionsm_cof theκ_q⁰-model (eq:mquadratic/eq:mcoherentl.4118–4125, stated against the bilinear factor setedgeBaseFactor).
The deep pinning identity — that a normalized section cocycle of the
descended double cover descTarget D hW equals
κ_q⁰-model + Γ_{γ_κ} + inf δ_κ in the Csec-coordinates, and that eT
is the actual zero-section pullback — is owned by the deferred
transgression unit (btChild_splits/zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty,
design §4.7); until it lands, the coordinated R4b keep must carry that
pinning alongside this bundle (same discipline as U7's ¬ZeroEdge
conditioning living on the future keep).
- D : EdgeComplement chief K lam hinv
Instances For
The bundle implies the zero-edge branch (design §6.1: the two R4 branches are mutually exclusive by construction).
m_c(0) = 0 (from eq:mquadratic at v = w = 0, char 2).
eq:mquadratic in solved form:
m_c(v+w) = m_c(v) + m_c(w) + f(cv, cw) + f(v, w).
a_{χ,κ} = (b_q̄^♭)⁻¹(γ_χ + γ_κ) (P6's polar_bijective at the #
head form; exists_polarRep/polarRep_unique packaged as the linear
equivalence)
The polar map of q̄_λ as a linear equivalence onto the dual
(nonsingularity + finiteness; lem:constrainedgauss l.3883–3885).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.edgePolarEquiv chief K lam hinv hne = LinearEquiv.ofBijective (Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeHeadForm chief K lam hinv hne).polar ⋯
Instances For
The representing 1-cochain a_{χ,κ} (eq:phaseclass input,
manuscript l.4093–4095): a_{χ,κ}(c) = (b_q̄^♭)⁻¹(γ_χ(c) + γ_κ(c)).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.aRep chief K lam hinv Z chi c = (Q2Presentation.Induction.edgePolarEquiv chief K lam hinv ⋯).symm (Q2Presentation.Induction.gammaChi chief K chi c + Z.gammaK c)
Instances For
Normalization: a_{χ,κ}(1) = 0.
a_{χ,κ} ∈ Z¹(C, V): the twisted 1-cocycle law
a(cd) = a(c) + c·a(d) (γ-cocycle laws + polar equivariance).
The base graph cocycle Θ_q⁰(a_{χ,κ}) and the total phase Δ_{χ,κ} #
Θ_q⁰(a_{χ,κ}) (eq:Theta0phase l.4097–4100, concrete graph
form eq:baseconnectingcochain l.2136–2139:
Θ(c,d) = f(a(c), c·a(d)) + m_c(a(d))).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Θ_q⁰(a_{χ,κ}) is a 2-cocycle (graph of a Z¹-cocycle pulled back
against the bilinear base model).
The total target-side phase Δ_{χ,κ}, towerC-spelling
(eq:phaseclass l.4101–4106): Δ = χ_*e + δ_κ + Θ_q⁰(a_{χ,κ}) — the
δ_κ-term enters exactly once (P6 §7.6 discipline; the engine's ε-slot
IS this term).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.DeltaC chief K lam hinv Z chi c d = ↑chi (Z.eT c d) + Z.deltaK c d + Q2Presentation.Induction.thetaGraph chief K lam hinv Z chi c d
Instances For
Δ_{χ,κ} is a normalized 2-cocycle: the χ_*e-leg by χ-invariance
(chi_act) applied to the twisted eT-law, the δ_κ-leg by the bundle
law, the Θ-leg by thetaGraph_cocycle.
Δ_{χ,κ} at the C-child carrier (the phaseCount-consumable #
spelling: P7's PhaseCoverTransform cocycle slots)
The phase class Δ_{χ,κ} on the C-child carrier — DeltaC
transported along the canonical collapse B/M' ≃* C (cChildCollapse);
the cocycle P7's phaseCount/phaseCoverPair consume at
ζ := Delta Z chi (design §4.7; per-cocycle discipline, no
class-invariance asserted).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Normalization, left slot (the hz1-slot of phaseCount).
Normalization, right slot (the hz2-slot of phaseCount).
The 2-cocycle law (the hzc-slot of phaseCount).