Documentation

Q2Presentation.Induction.TransgressionUnit

The λ-free extension structure of B/T' #

theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.vLayer_mul_self {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (x : (btChild chief K).fst.Y) (hx : x ∈ vLayer chief K) :
x * x = 1

vLayer-elements square to 1 (M' is elementary, descended).

theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.vLayer_comm {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (x x' : (btChild chief K).fst.Y) (hx : x ∈ vLayer chief K) (hx' : x' ∈ vLayer chief K) :
x * x' = x' * x

vLayer is abelian (M' is abelian, descended).

The projection to the base of 1 → V → B/T' → C → 1, ambient form.

Equations
Instances For

    The base projection btProj : B/T' ↠ C (T' ≤ M' collapse).

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[simp]

      btProj on a double child class: the C-class of the ambient element (Noether III computed).

      ker btProj = vLayer, elementwise (the extension identity).

      The fibre inclusion vInG : V → B/T' and its conjugation law #

      The multiplicative fibre map M → vLayer (through mChildDescend).

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The fibre map kills the radical layer (T-transport of the bridge).

        The group-carrier fibre inclusion V → B/T'.

        Equations
        Instances For
          theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.vInG_add {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (v w : towerM K ⧸ towerT K) :
          vInG chief K (v + w) = vInG chief K v * vInG chief K w
          theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.vInG_conj {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (x : (btChild chief K).fst.Y) (v : towerM K ⧸ towerT K) :
          x * vInG chief K v * x⁻¹ = vInG chief K ((headActE chief K ((btProj chief K) x)) v)

          Conjugation covers the head action: conjugating the fibre by any element of B/T' acts by headActE at the image C-class — the lem:transgression compatibility, fully proven.

          The splitting statement and its section criterion #

          B/T' splits as V⋊C (the conclusion of lem:transgression at the child, complement form — the exact shape of the Csec/hdisj/hsup slots of ZeroEdgeDescentData, design §4.7).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.btChild_splits_of_section {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (s : towerC K →* (btChild chief K).fst.Y) (hs : ∀ (c : towerC K), (btProj chief K) (s c) = c) :

            A homomorphic section of btProj yields the complement.

            The two remaining inputs, as named data/Props (hypothesis #

            discipline — the RadicalEdgeHalving pattern; NOT axioms)

            The κ_q⁰-model data at the R4b head: the coherent equivariant correction functions m_c of lem:extraspecialconnecting (eq:mquadratic l.2118–2120 + eq:mcoherent l.2122–2124) against the bilinear factor set edgeBaseFactor — exactly the mC-slots of ZeroEdgeDescentData.

            Instances For

              KEEP-SHAPED INPUT (named Prop, consumed as a hypothesis): the base equivariant determinant class exists at the R4b head.

              Provenance (manuscript): lem:basedetclass l.2286–2360 — the normalized base class κ_q⁰ ∈ Z²(V⋊H,𝔽₂) with fibre square map q, built on an H-split regular pair via the three orbit-polynomial factor sets (eq:squareorbitfactor, eq:freeorbitfactor, eq:kappahalforbit); its normalized-section action data are exactly the m_c of lem:extraspecialconnecting. The proof consumes the tame module structure (projectivity via lem:faithfulprojective in the ramified case, Maschke in the odd unramified case) — genuinely arithmetic input about V, NOT finite bookkeeping.

              Dissolution program (owner: the P6 base-class lane, coordinated with BLOCKR_P6_DESIGN §1.1 which records the eq:basekappacochain normalization shape): (i) the split pair V → 𝔽₂[H]^N → V at the head (edgeHead-carrier Maschke/projectivity); (ii) the three orbit factor sets with their m_c = 0 resp. half-orbit corrections; (iii) pullback and the eq:mquadratic/eq:mcoherent laws. Until it lands, both btChild_splits_of and zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty_of consume the DATA (BaseModelData) as an explicit hypothesis.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The descended-cover reading data for lem:transgression at the child: a normalized set-section σ of btProj with its section cochain η (eq:extensionfactortransgression), and the two 𝔽₂-readings of the descended central double cover — the fibre factor cochain g (squares = q̄_λ, symmetry defect = b̄, 2-cocycle) and the conjugation defect n ((†) quadratic law; (‡) eq:transgressioncochain, concrete).

                Every field is FINITE BOOKKEEPING over the GREEN U1–U3 layer (no arithmetic input): g/n are relRead-readings in descTarget D hW (squares/commutators/conjugations of mCover-lifts — scalarProj_sq_eq_form, scalarProj_comm_eq_polar, mCover_conj_fix through descProj; centrality of the deck by descKernel_le_center), σ/η come from Classical.choice sections of the two surjections. The construction is the remaining MECHANICAL obligation of this unit (deferred for size, NOT keep-shaped; program in the §14 design notes).

                Instances For

                  Named deferred-construction Prop (hypothesis slot; see the TransgressionDescentData docstring for the two-part provenance: the manuscript source is lem:transgression's section/reading choices at the descended cover of lem:radicaledge step 7, and the dissolution is the mechanical U1–U3 reading construction — finite bookkeeping, no keeps).

                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.btChild_splits_of {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (lam : Module.Dual (ZMod 2) (Lifting.NAdd (xrKernel chief K))) (hinv : lam ∈ Lifting.conjInvDuals (xrKernel chief K)) (hne : lam ≠ 0) (R : TransgressionDescentData chief K lam hinv hne) (M : BaseModelData chief K lam hinv hne) :

                    lem:transgression at the child, PROVEN from the reading data and the κ_q⁰-model (l.3464–3530 + l.4032–4034): the engine's coboundary a shears the section homomorphic, and its range is the complement.

                    theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.btChild_splits {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (lam : Module.Dual (ZMod 2) (Lifting.NAdd (xrKernel chief K))) (hinv : lam ∈ Lifting.conjInvDuals (xrKernel chief K)) (hne : lam ≠ 0) (hread : TransgressionReading chief K lam hinv hne) (hbase : BaseModelExists chief K lam hinv hne) :

                    (a) btChild_splits, in the honest hypothesis-form: the zero-edge B/T' splits as V⋊C, GIVEN the two named inputs (reading data: mechanical, deferred; base model: lem:basedetclass, P6-owned).

                    theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty_of {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (lam : Module.Dual (ZMod 2) (Lifting.NAdd (xrKernel chief K))) (hinv : lam ∈ Lifting.conjInvDuals (xrKernel chief K)) (hne : lam ≠ 0) (hZ : ZeroEdge chief K lam hinv) (hsplit : SplitsBtChild chief K) (M : BaseModelData chief K lam hinv hne) :
                    Nonempty (ZeroEdgeDescentData chief K lam hinv)

                    (b) the U8 bundle exists given ZeroEdge + the splitting + a κ_q⁰-model: Csec/hdisj/hsup from the splitting, mC from the model, and the UNPINNED cochain slots γ_κ = δ_κ = e = 0 (all cocycle laws trivial). This is exactly the existence half P8's Classical.byCases split consumes (design §6.1); the tie to the ACTUAL descended class is the separate pinning (ZeroEdgePinning below), carried by the future coordinated keep — the §13 note's discipline.

                    theorem Q2Presentation.Induction.zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (lam : Module.Dual (ZMod 2) (Lifting.NAdd (xrKernel chief K))) (hinv : lam ∈ Lifting.conjInvDuals (xrKernel chief K)) (hne : lam ≠ 0) (hZ : ZeroEdge chief K lam hinv) (hread : TransgressionReading chief K lam hinv hne) (hbase : BaseModelExists chief K lam hinv hne) :
                    Nonempty (ZeroEdgeDescentData chief K lam hinv)

                    (b) zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty, hypothesis-form (the design §4.7 name): ZeroEdge + the two named inputs give the bundle.

                    (c) The base-identity pinning (eq:descendedclass + #

                    lem:affinelifting's zero-section pullback, in Csec-coordinates)

                    The radical-layer inclusion T → B (bridge form; lands in T').

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      def Q2Presentation.Induction.descToBt {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (lam : Module.Dual (ZMod 2) (Lifting.NAdd (xrKernel chief K))) (hinv : lam ∈ Lifting.conjInvDuals (xrKernel chief K)) (D : EdgeComplement chief K lam hinv) (hW : D.W.Normal) (hne : lam ≠ 0) :
                      (descTarget chief K lam hinv D hW).Y →* (btChild chief K).fst.Y

                      The descended double cover mapped onto B/T' (deck collapse composed with descCollapseChild).

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        def Q2Presentation.Induction.descRead {p : FramedPair} (chief : FirstNonScalarChiefFactor p) (K : KernelMinimal chief.toNonScalarChiefFactor) (lam : Module.Dual (ZMod 2) (Lifting.NAdd (xrKernel chief K))) (hinv : lam ∈ Lifting.conjInvDuals (xrKernel chief K)) (D : EdgeComplement chief K lam hinv) (hW : D.W.Normal) (x : (descTarget chief K lam hinv D hW).Y) :

                        The 𝔽₂-reading of the descended deck (relRead idiom at the descended target: 1 ↦ 0, else 1; on the order-2 descKernel this is the λ-pinned isomorphism, card_descKernel_eq_two).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The base-identity pinning of a bundle Z — the §13 deferral's third item, concrete. In the Z.Csec-coordinates (a multiplicative section s, so the section cochain η vanishes), the normalized section cocycle of the ACTUAL descended cover descTarget Z.D Z.hW at the total section (v,c) ↦ ℓ̂(v)·σ̂(c) is κ((v,c),(w,d)) = g(v,cw) + n_c(w) + e(c,d) with g/n/e the three deck readings; the fields pin

                          • g = edgeBaseFactor (fib_*): the fibre part is the κ_q⁰-model factor set — eq:basekappacochain's fibre normalization;
                          • n_c = Z.mC c + Z.gammaK c ∘ (c·) (conj_*): the conjugation defect is the model correction plus the Γ_{γ_κ}-term (eq:Gammagamma);
                          • e = Z.deltaK (sec_*): the pure base part is the inflated scalar —

                          i.e. κ = κ_q⁰ + Γ_{γ_κ} + inf δ_κ as normalized cochains, eq:descendedclass l.4037–4045 ON THE NOSE; and tau_eT pins Z.eT as the actual zero-section pullback of B → V⋊C along the Csec-section (lem:affinelifting l.4050–4056). Nonempty (ZeroEdgePinning … Z) is the pinning hypothesis the FUTURE coordinated R4b keep must carry alongside Z (both U8/U9 zero-edge keep docstrings + §13 note 6).

                          Instances For

                            A pinned bundle's Csec-section witnesses the splitting (the pinning implies (a) for its own bundle — consistency of the packaging).

                            The pinning Prop — the exact hypothesis slot the future coordinated zero-edge keep must carry alongside the bundle Z until the reading-data construction lands (the §13 note's discipline: conditioning lives on the future keep, never in the count Props).

                            Equations
                            Instances For