The λ-free extension structure of B/T' #
vLayer-elements square to 1 (M' is elementary, descended).
vLayer is abelian (M' is abelian, descended).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.instCommGroupVLayer chief K = { toGroup := inferInstance, mul_comm := ⋯ }
Equations
The projection to the base of 1 → V → B/T' → C → 1, ambient form.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.btProjAux chief K = (Q2Presentation.Induction.mChildCollapse chief K).toMonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' (Q2Presentation.Induction.mChild chief K))
Instances For
The base projection btProj : B/T' ↠ C (T' ≤ M' collapse).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.btProj chief K = QuotientGroup.lift (Q2Presentation.Induction.tChild chief K) (Q2Presentation.Induction.btProjAux chief K) ⋯
Instances For
btProj on a double child class: the C-class of the ambient
element (Noether III computed).
ker btProj = vLayer, elementwise (the extension identity).
The multiplicative fibre map M → vLayer (through mChildDescend).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The fibre map kills the radical layer (T-transport of the bridge).
The linear fibre inclusion V = M/T →ₗ Additive vLayer
(the T-quotient descent of vLayerHom).
Equations
Instances For
The group-carrier fibre inclusion V → B/T'.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.vInG chief K v = ↑(Additive.toMul ((Q2Presentation.Induction.vIn chief K) v))
Instances For
Conjugation covers the head action: conjugating the fibre by any
element of B/T' acts by headActE at the image C-class — the
lem:transgression compatibility, fully proven.
The splitting statement and its section criterion #
B/T' splits as V⋊C (the conclusion of lem:transgression at
the child, complement form — the exact shape of the Csec/hdisj/hsup
slots of ZeroEdgeDescentData, design §4.7).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A homomorphic section of btProj yields the complement.
The two remaining inputs, as named data/Props (hypothesis #
discipline — the RadicalEdgeHalving pattern; NOT axioms)
The κ_q⁰-model data at the R4b head: the coherent equivariant
correction functions m_c of lem:extraspecialconnecting
(eq:mquadratic l.2118–2120 + eq:mcoherent l.2122–2124) against the
bilinear factor set edgeBaseFactor — exactly the mC-slots of
ZeroEdgeDescentData.
Instances For
KEEP-SHAPED INPUT (named Prop, consumed as a hypothesis):
the base equivariant determinant class exists at the R4b head.
Provenance (manuscript): lem:basedetclass l.2286–2360 — the normalized
base class κ_q⁰ ∈ Z²(V⋊H,𝔽₂) with fibre square map q, built on an
H-split regular pair via the three orbit-polynomial factor sets
(eq:squareorbitfactor, eq:freeorbitfactor, eq:kappahalforbit);
its normalized-section action data are exactly the m_c of
lem:extraspecialconnecting. The proof consumes the tame module
structure (projectivity via lem:faithfulprojective in the ramified
case, Maschke in the odd unramified case) — genuinely arithmetic input
about V, NOT finite bookkeeping.
Dissolution program (owner: the P6 base-class lane, coordinated with
BLOCKR_P6_DESIGN §1.1 which records the eq:basekappacochain
normalization shape): (i) the split pair V → 𝔽₂[H]^N → V at the head
(edgeHead-carrier Maschke/projectivity); (ii) the three orbit factor
sets with their m_c = 0 resp. half-orbit corrections; (iii) pullback
and the eq:mquadratic/eq:mcoherent laws. Until it lands, both
btChild_splits_of and zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty_of consume the
DATA (BaseModelData) as an explicit hypothesis.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.BaseModelExists chief K lam hinv hne = Nonempty (Q2Presentation.Induction.BaseModelData chief K lam hinv hne)
Instances For
The descended-cover reading data for lem:transgression at the
child: a normalized set-section σ of btProj with its section cochain
η (eq:extensionfactortransgression), and the two 𝔽₂-readings of the
descended central double cover — the fibre factor cochain g (squares
= q̄_λ, symmetry defect = b̄, 2-cocycle) and the conjugation defect
n ((†) quadratic law; (‡) eq:transgressioncochain, concrete).
Every field is FINITE BOOKKEEPING over the GREEN U1–U3 layer (no
arithmetic input): g/n are relRead-readings in
descTarget D hW (squares/commutators/conjugations of mCover-lifts —
scalarProj_sq_eq_form, scalarProj_comm_eq_polar, mCover_conj_fix
through descProj; centrality of the deck by descKernel_le_center),
σ/η come from Classical.choice sections of the two surjections.
The construction is the remaining MECHANICAL obligation of this unit
(deferred for size, NOT keep-shaped; program in the §14 design notes).
Instances For
Named deferred-construction Prop (hypothesis slot; see the
TransgressionDescentData docstring for the two-part provenance: the
manuscript source is lem:transgression's section/reading choices at the
descended cover of lem:radicaledge step 7, and the dissolution is the
mechanical U1–U3 reading construction — finite bookkeeping, no keeps).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.TransgressionReading chief K lam hinv hne = Nonempty (Q2Presentation.Induction.TransgressionDescentData chief K lam hinv hne)
Instances For
lem:transgression at the child, PROVEN from the reading data and
the κ_q⁰-model (l.3464–3530 + l.4032–4034): the engine's coboundary
a shears the section homomorphic, and its range is the complement.
(a) btChild_splits, in the honest hypothesis-form: the zero-edge
B/T' splits as V⋊C, GIVEN the two named inputs (reading data:
mechanical, deferred; base model: lem:basedetclass, P6-owned).
(b) the U8 bundle exists given ZeroEdge + the splitting + a
κ_q⁰-model: Csec/hdisj/hsup from the splitting, mC from the model,
and the UNPINNED cochain slots γ_κ = δ_κ = e = 0 (all cocycle laws
trivial). This is exactly the existence half P8's Classical.byCases
split consumes (design §6.1); the tie to the ACTUAL descended class is
the separate pinning (ZeroEdgePinning below), carried by the future
coordinated keep — the §13 note's discipline.
(b) zeroEdgeDescentData_nonempty, hypothesis-form (the design
§4.7 name): ZeroEdge + the two named inputs give the bundle.
(c) The base-identity pinning (eq:descendedclass + #
lem:affinelifting's zero-section pullback, in Csec-coordinates)
The radical-layer inclusion T → B (bridge form; lands in T').
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.tIn chief K t = ↑((Q2Presentation.Induction.mChildDescend chief K) (Additive.toMul ↑t))
Instances For
The descended double cover mapped onto B/T' (deck collapse
composed with descCollapseChild).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The 𝔽₂-reading of the descended deck (relRead idiom at the
descended target: 1 ↦ 0, else 1; on the order-2 descKernel this is
the λ-pinned isomorphism, card_descKernel_eq_two).
Instances For
The base-identity pinning of a bundle Z — the §13 deferral's
third item, concrete. In the Z.Csec-coordinates (a multiplicative
section s, so the section cochain η vanishes), the normalized
section cocycle of the ACTUAL descended cover descTarget Z.D Z.hW at
the total section (v,c) ↦ ℓ̂(v)·σ̂(c) is
κ((v,c),(w,d)) = g(v,cw) + n_c(w) + e(c,d) with g/n/e the three deck
readings; the fields pin
g = edgeBaseFactor(fib_*): the fibre part is theκ_q⁰-model factor set —eq:basekappacochain's fibre normalization;n_c = Z.mC c + Z.gammaK c ∘ (c·)(conj_*): the conjugation defect is the model correction plus theΓ_{γ_κ}-term (eq:Gammagamma);e = Z.deltaK(sec_*): the pure base part is the inflated scalar —
i.e. κ = κ_q⁰ + Γ_{γ_κ} + inf δ_κ as normalized cochains,
eq:descendedclass l.4037–4045 ON THE NOSE; and tau_eT pins Z.eT as
the actual zero-section pullback of B → V⋊C along the Csec-section
(lem:affinelifting l.4050–4056). Nonempty (ZeroEdgePinning … Z) is
the pinning hypothesis the FUTURE coordinated R4b keep must carry
alongside Z (both U8/U9 zero-edge keep docstrings + §13 note 6).
- tau : towerC K → (XRZero.xrChild chief K).fst.Y
- sigmaHat : towerC K → (descTarget chief K lam hinv Z.D ⋯).Y
Instances For
A pinned bundle's Csec-section witnesses the splitting (the pinning
implies (a) for its own bundle — consistency of the packaging).
The pinning Prop — the exact hypothesis slot the future
coordinated zero-edge keep must carry alongside the bundle Z until the
reading-data construction lands (the §13 note's discipline: conditioning
lives on the future keep, never in the count Props).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.ZeroEdgeDescentDataPinned chief K lam hinv Z = Nonempty (Q2Presentation.Induction.ZeroEdgePinning chief K lam hinv Z)