Frame facts for the T̃-family at a cover marking #
Central elements of the cover act trivially on the T̃-kernel.
Relator operators are trivial on T̃: relator values of a cover
marking are deck elements, and the deck kernel is central.
The tame relation at the cover's tame quotient (mirror of
mChild_tame_relation): the tame relator defect lies in relN ≤ L_{B_λ},
hence dies under π̃.
4 divides the cover order: |B_λ| = |B| · 2 (kernel–quotient count
at ker p_λ = relN) and 4 ∣ |B| (mChild_card_Y_four).
The cover marking covers B_λ modulo M̃ (mChild_marking_covers
pushed through p_λ; the closure transfers by MonoidHom.map_closure).
Killing the marked window upgrades to full conjugation-invariance:
every operator agrees with a marked-closure operator (M̃ acts trivially,
and the marking covers B_λ modulo M̃).
The dichotomy half: a separating invariant functional yields ZeroEdge #
The kernel of a T̃-functional, as a subgroup of the cover.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A conjugation-invariant functional separating the deck generator
yields a NORMAL edge complement (lem:radicaledge step 3, dual form):
its kernel inside T̃ is conjugation-stable, meets relN trivially, and
fills T̃ together with relN.
The diamond hits the anti-diagonal deck pair #
The deck-shadow witness: at a nonzero edge, some T̃-tuple has
relator rows exactly (z, 0) at the canonical cover marking of a fibre
point. Step 1 (dichotomy): ¬ ZeroEdge forces the deck generator into the
marked augmentation window — else a separating functional builds a normal
complement (zeroEdge_of_separating_dual). Step 2: diamondAtW_all at the
top window (faithfulness from hfaithNT_of_frame) converts the membership
into a row preimage.
Deck-valued shadows give relator cocycles of pairing 1 #
Pushed perturbed relator evaluation: if a relator's T̃-shadow at a
cover marking is deck-valued, the corresponding perturbation of the CHILD
marking still kills the relator (push eval_perturb through p_λ, whose
kernel is exactly the deck kernel).
A tuple with deck-valued relator shadows is a relator cocycle: the
pushed M'-shadows vanish (foxShadow_eq_zero_of_eval_eq downstairs).
The pairing of a deck-shadow tuple is 1: relRead z + relRead 1
with z the nontrivial deck element.
The exit: keep 1 as a theorem #
EdgeTwistFlip from ¬ ZeroEdge — the statement of the interim
keep sec7_edgeTwistFlip_gammaA, proven: over every child surjection some
weak M-lift carries a relator cocycle of edge pairing 1. The
manuscript's [ε̄] ≠ 0 ⟹ degree-one-duality nonvanishing (lem:radicaledge
step 6, l.4006–4019) is realized by the (♦)-dévissage: ¬ ZeroEdge places
the deck generator in the marked augmentation window (else a separating
invariant functional's kernel is a normal complement), and the diamond
produces a T̃-tuple with relator rows (z, 0) — a TwistCocycle of
pairing relRead z = 1.