The strata boundary and the cocycle-law transport #
The fibre covers B modulo M' (support, §13-P8WL): the
composite-to-C' surjectivity of a total-space point says exactly that
its values fill B up to M'-corrections — and nothing more (weak lifts
are genuinely non-surjective in general; any statement placing values
beyond im(f)·M' is (W1)-content and is NOT asserted here).
(t1) The twisted-cocycle law transports across the fibre:
value-functions with the same M'-classes induce the same conjugation on
M'-valued tuples (M' abelian), so a Z¹-law at one weak lift holds
at every weak lift with the same base.
(t2) The hom-level twist #
The hom-level twist of a weak M-lift by an M'-valued cocycle
(the presentation-free twistLift; construction mirrors
liftHom_equiv_Z1.invFun): γ ↦ f(γ)·u(γ) is again a framed weak
lift.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The twist preserves the fibration base.
The twist is an involution (M'-values square to 1).
The flip Prop and the halving exit #
The GQ2 twist-flip (hom-level; the §13-P8WL candidate-keep Prop):
over every child surjection there is a T'-valued continuous tuple,
a twisted cocycle at every weak lift of the fibre (transport by
z1_law_transport), whose twist flips λ-liftability across the fibre.
Manuscript content: lem:radicaledge step 6 at Γ = G_{ℚ₂} —
prop:localduality perfectness + the variation computation; §13-P8WL
records why this residue is not derivable from the current citable
clauses ((W1)/(W2)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
(t3) The halving from the flip (hom-level mirror of
edgeHalvingGammaA_of_twistFlip): a flipping T'-twist pairs the fibre
involutively across λ-liftability, so exactly half of each fibre is
λ-liftable. Either keep-2 endgame recovers q2_edgeHalving's statement
through this exit.
(t4)/(t5): direction 1 and fibre-uniformity at the cover #
T̃ is the full p_λ-preimage of T' (support, §13-P8WL): the
backward inclusion factors an arbitrary preimage through relN ≤ T̃.
(t4) Flip direction 1 (both-liftable data ⟹ the twist lifts):
the pointwise difference of a cover-lift of f and a cover-lift of its
T'-twist is a T̃-valued continuous ft-cocycle projecting to u.
The (W2)-converse is NOT asserted.
(t5) Cover-cocycles are fibre-uniform (hom-level
C-factorization): cover-value functions with the same M'-classes
downstairs differ by M̃-elements, which act trivially on T̃
(mCover_conj_fix), so a T̃-valued cocycle law at one transports to
the other.
(t6) The |X|-dichotomy: the dual pullback along T̃ ↠ T' #
The projection T̃ → T' as a group hom (idiom:
scalarRelProjMul; both carriers in the KERNEL-projection spelling so
that the NAdd-headed instances fire reducibly — banked fix-class).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The induced 𝔽₂-linear surjection NAdd T̃ →ₗ NAdd T' (idiom:
scalarRelProj).
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.tCoverProjT chief K lam hinv hne = { toFun := ⇑(MonoidHom.toAdditive (Q2Presentation.Induction.tCoverProjMul chief K lam hinv hne)), map_add' := ⋯, map_smul' := ⋯ }
Instances For
The kernel of the projection is the deck line.
The projection intertwines the conjugation operators.
The pullback of an invariant T'-dual is an invariant T̃-dual.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.pullbackInvDual chief K lam hinv hne φ = ⟨↑φ ∘ₗ Q2Presentation.Induction.tCoverProjT chief K lam hinv hne, ⋯⟩
Instances For
Invariant T̃-duals kill the deck line at a nonzero edge
(§12-P8W's dichotomy, dual reading): a nonzero value on the deck
generator would produce a normal edge complement.
The dual pullback is onto the invariant T̃-duals at a nonzero
edge: an invariant dual kills the deck line, hence factors through the
projection; the factor is invariant since the projection is onto and
intertwines.
(t6) The ZeroEdge side: the deck functional of a normal complement #
The relN-coordinate reading along an edge complement.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.deckDual chief K lam hinv hne D v = Q2Presentation.Induction.relRead chief K lam hinv (Q2Presentation.Induction.edgeZ chief K lam hinv D hne ↑(Additive.toMul v) ⋯)
Instances For
Additivity of the deck reading (unique-decomposition recombination).
The deck reading as a linear functional.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.deckDualLin chief K lam hinv hne D = { toFun := Q2Presentation.Induction.deckDual chief K lam hinv hne D, map_add' := ⋯, map_smul' := ⋯ }
Instances For
Normality makes the deck reading invariant: conjugation moves the
W-component inside W and fixes the central relN-component.
The deck reading is 1 on the deck generator.
(t6) The |X|-dichotomy, assembled #
At a nonzero edge the pullback is a bijection: |X_{T̃}| = |X_{T'}|.
At zero edge the deck functional of a normal complement enlarges the invariant-dual space: the cards differ.
(t6) The |X|-dichotomy (§13-P8WL): the edge is nonzero exactly
when the invariant-dual spaces of T̃ and T' have the same size —
the count-comparison input of the keep-2 endgame.