The generic (140) assembly #
The source-generic wiring from the keystone chain (the Prop. 8.9 assembly) to the
RecursionInputs.phase140 field, per (l, h) in the zero-edge case:
Enrichment.descData— theDescData (En.radData l h)repackaging of the enrichment (1:1 fields;ker_piBCsupplieshkerC0);descSigma/descSections— the chosen descended splitting (descended_splitting, Lemma 6.21) and normalized count-sections;phaseChi— the per-(l,h)phase-cover familyζ ↦ centralCoverOfCocycle (Δ_{ζ,κ_λ})from the provedDeltaChidata;rho0_descData_rhoPrime— the transported lower map'sC₀-descent is the originalC-lift (rho0 ∘ rhoPrime = ρ.1.1), which makes the master count's sign matchphaseSignon the nose throughsign_iotaB_pullCoc_eq_lift_sign;hMobst_of_residues— the per-ρphase-obstruction identity, fromtwo_mul_card_centralImageatΔ := DeltaChi,sh := shChi,hkey := keystone;phase140_from_residues— thephase140-field display viaphase140_of_phaseObstruction, parametric over the per-source residues{htriv, hfg, hH2, hsep, hpartial, hZcard, hGaussZ, hμ}.
All source-generic; the per-source leaves discharge the residues.
The descent datum of the enrichment (design §8): the DescData repackaging of
En at (l, h) — C₀ := C-stage, piC₀ := π_{BC} (kernel M_B by ker_piBC), and the
descended module/form/factor-set fields verbatim.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The chosen descended splitting σ : C₀ →* Q (Lemma 6.21 in the zero-edge regime).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.descSigma En l h Dsc = ⋯.choose
Instances For
The chosen normalized count-sections over descSigma.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.descSections En l h Dsc = ⋯.some
Instances For
The per-(l,h) phase-cover family (the paper's ζ ↦ C_{Δ_{ζ,κ_λ}}): the twisted
product of the proved total scalar phase Δ_ζ, with the cocycle law and normalizations
from the keystone file.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.phaseChi En l h Dsc ζ = GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.centralCoverOfCocycle (GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.DeltaChi (GQ2.SectionEight.descSections En l h Dsc) Dsc ⋯ ζ) ⋯ ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
The phase index is nonempty: 0 < #(T^∨)^C (the §9 induction strengthening's supplier).
The lower-map roundtrip: the C₀-descent of the transported lower map is the
original C-exact-image map — rho0 (descData) (rhoPrime ρ) = ρ.1.1. This is what aligns
the master count's ι_Γ(ρ'^*Δ)-signs with phaseSign's lift-condition at ρ.1.1.
The source-Gauss residue (the Prop. 8.9 assembly): the exact hGaussZ input of
phase140_from_residues — ∑ᶠ c : Z¹_{Γ,ρ'}(V), sign(Q⁰ c) = #V · G0 at every lower map.
By the Prop. 8.9 assembly's layer (I) (gaussZ_reduction) this reduces to ∑_{Z¹⧸B¹} sign(Q̄⁰) = G0, the
(83)-evaluation G0 = ∓2^m (the Prop. 8.9 assembly). A named abbreviation so the prop_8_9 ledger stays
readable.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The per-ρ phase-obstruction identity from the residues (the hMobst of the
paper-faithful (140) reducer): the master count two_mul_card_centralImage at the keystone
data (Δ := DeltaChi, sh := shChi, hkey := keystone), with each ±1 rewritten to the
signed liftability through the phaseChi-cover via the roundtrip and the sign bridge.
The (140) display from the residues (the RecursionInputs.phase140 field at
(l, h), per-λ family phaseChi): phase140_of_phaseObstruction at the derived
hMobst, the μ-torsor input hμ, and hWV := enrichment_card_Vmod.
Paper-tag ledger (auto-generated by paperforge; do not edit) #
- Lemma 6.21 = ⟦lem-transgression⟧