The affine T-lifting obstruction over the V-cocycle layer (Lemma 8.7, (131)) #
For a V-coordinate c ∈ Z¹_{Γ,ρ}(V) (c1a's VCocycle), when is g_c = qOfCocycle c the
T-reduction of an actual — and central — M-lift? Following the paper's Lemma 8.7 (p. 41)
at cocycle level:
tDef— theT-valued defect of the pointwise liftγ ↦ mV(c γ)·uσ(ρ'γ)ofg_c(the paper's "∂c + ρ^*e" in one piece;CountSectionsfixes the normalized set-sections).TCharC— theC-invariant𝔽₂-character groupD = (T^∨)^C(the paper's phase index).chiDef— theχ-pushforwardχ_*(tDef c) ∈ Z²(Γ,𝔽₂)(chiDef_mem_Z2:C-invariance ofχkills the crossed twist), andbetaChi χ c := ι_Γ(χ_* tDef c)— theχ-component of theT-lifting obstruction.TLiftable(131):cis theV-coordinate of anM-lift;tliftable_iffcharacterizes it — the easy direction (betaChi ≡ 0) is generic (betaChi_of_tliftable), the converse is the source-specific separationhsep(the(T^∨)^C ≅ H²_{Γ,ρ}(T)^∨perfectness of cor. 5.17/5.16, threaded to the d6e residue list — the d6ahsep_homidiom).betaXi— the scalar obstructionι_Γ(g_c^*ξ)through the descended coverQ̃ = B̃/N(xiof the Prop. 8.9 assembly), withcentral_iff_betaXi: anM-lift overg_cis central iffbetaXi c = 0(the bridge fromCentralObstruction.obthroughmk_N).mem_centralImage_iff:cis theV-coordinate of a centralM-lift iffTLiftable c ∧ betaXi c = 0— the complete (131)-characterization the master count consumes.
Everything is source-generic std-3; the Γ-specific inputs (hsep, and the counting facts) are
threaded as hypotheses.
The C-invariant character group D = (T^∨)^C #
The C-invariant 𝔽₂-characters of T (the paper's D = (T^∨)^C, p. 42):
additive characters T → 𝔽₂ invariant under the full B-conjugation (which factors through
C since M centralizes T). An additive subgroup of the function space.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The section data and the pointwise B-lift #
The section pair for the master count: normalized set-sections mV of descend and
uσ of piT over the splitting σ.
A set-section of
descend : M ↠ V.- mV_zero : self.mV 0 = 1
- uσ : DD.C0 → Bg
A set-lift of
σ : C₀ → QthroughpiT : B ↠ Q. - uσ_one : self.uσ 1 = 1
Instances For
Section pairs exist (finite surjections; normalize at the identity).
The pointwise B-lift γ ↦ mV(c γ) · uσ(ρ'γ) of g_c = qOfCocycle c.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.fLift S c γ = ↑(S.mV (c.c γ)) * S.uσ ((GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.rho0 DD ρ) γ)
Instances For
mV covers iV through piT.
The pointwise lift lies over g_c through piT.
The defect of the pointwise lift lies in T.
The T-valued defect of the pointwise lift — the paper's ∂c + ρ^*e in one piece
(Lemma 8.7's normalized-cocycle representative, pulled back along the graph of c).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The χ-pushforward of the defect.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.chiDef S hσ χ c p = ↑χ (GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.tDef S hσ c p)
Instances For
The pointwise lift is continuous (through the discrete Q × B/M, since V carries no
topology — the iV-embedded continuity of c is inverted by injectivity).
The T-defect is continuous.
The χ-pushforward of the defect is a continuous 2-cocycle: the nonabelian defect
identity conjugates by fLift, and C-invariance of χ kills the conjugation.
The χ-component of the T-lifting obstruction: β_χ(c) := ι_Γ(χ_* tDef c).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.betaChi S hσ χ c = GQ2.SectionEight.iotaB (GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.chiDef S hσ χ c)
Instances For
(131): the T-liftability characterization #
T-liftability of a V-coordinate: c is the T-reduction of an actual M-lift.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.TLiftable hσ c = ∃ (f : GQ2.SectionEight.MLifts D ρ), GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.redTLift DD f = GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.qOfCocycle DD ρ σ hσ c
Instances For
The generic direction of (131): a liftable V-coordinate has vanishing χ-obstruction
for every χ — the defect of the pointwise lift is a crossed coboundary, and χ (being
C-invariant) sends it to a plain continuous coboundary.
The scalar obstruction through the descended cover #
The scalar obstruction of a V-coordinate: ι_Γ(g_c^* ξ), the lifting obstruction of
g_c through the descended central double cover Q̃ = B̃/N ↠ Q (defect cocycle ξ).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
ccZsign of an inverse kernel element.
The descended cover is discrete (quotient of the discrete cover).
Sign-defect well-definedness: two continuous pointwise lifts of the same continuous
homomorphic map through descP have z̄-sign defect cochains differing by a continuous
coboundary — hence the same B²-membership.
zsign on the cover kernel matches ccZsign after mk_N.
The scalar-obstruction bridge: an M-lift with T-reduction g_c is central iff the
ξ-obstruction of g_c vanishes — CentralObstruction.ob computed through mk_N and
transported to the s₀-section by sign-defect well-definedness.
The complete (131)-characterization (the Prop. 8.9 assembly): c is the V-coordinate of a
central M-lift iff it is T-liftable and its scalar ξ-obstruction vanishes.
Group structure and finiteness of Z¹_{Γ,ρ}(V) #
The χ-additivity of the T-obstruction and the base form Q⁰ #
Negation on Z¹_{Γ,ρ}(V) is the identity (V has exponent 2).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.instNegVCocycle = { neg := fun (a : GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.VCocycle DD ρ) => a }
Z¹_{Γ,ρ}(V) is an elementary abelian 2-group.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
β_χ vanishes at the zero character.
β_χ is additive in the character (ι_Γ-additivity, #H²(Γ,𝔽₂) = 2).
The base determinant form Q⁰_{Γ,ρ} on Z¹_{Γ,ρ}(V): ι_Γ of the graph pullback of
the fixed equivariant base class κ⁰ (eq. (62)/(133)-side).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.QZero DD ρ c = GQ2.SectionEight.iotaB (GQ2.graphPullback DD.dat (fun (γ : Γ) => (GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.rho0 DD ρ) γ) c.c)
Instances For
The master count #
Transporting the central red_T-image count to the V-cocycle layer.
The master count (the Prop. 8.9 assembly/c1c interface): the per-ρ phase-obstruction identity of
the paper's Prop 8.9 proof, derived from the (131)-characterization by double Fourier
expansion. The source-specific inputs are threaded: hH2 (#H²(Γ,𝔽₂) = 2), hsep (the
(T^∨)^C-separation of the T-obstruction), haff/hpartial (affineness and nontriviality
of the χ-components — ∂-surjectivity), hkey (the (135) completed square, from the
keystone file), hZcard (#Z¹(V) = #V²) and hGaussZ (G(Q⁰) = #V·G0 — the source-Gauss
transport).
Paper-tag ledger (auto-generated by paperforge; do not edit) #
- cor 5.17 = ⟦cor-adjointboundary⟧
- eq. (62) = ⟦eq-baseconnectingcochain⟧
- Lemma 8.7 = ⟦lem-affinelifting⟧
- Prop 8.9 = ⟦thm-closedrecursion⟧ (= theorem 8.17 in current tex)