The semidirect atom calculus and the ω_χ-decomposition #
Split off from GQ2.KeystoneDelta (design §§1–2). This file provides:
- the raw semidirect calculus on
V × C₀(pmul,pone, associativity) with the transported product mapsjmap/Jmapand their multiplicativity; - the three
T-valued defect atomsmDef/conjDef/uDefand the product formulaJDefT = conjDef · uDef · mDef, with themDef/conjDefatom identities; - the
ω_χ-decompositionχ ∘ JDef = kappa0 (datχ χ) + inflScalar (eχ χ)via the equivariant zero-form factor-set datumdatChi.
See GQ2.KeystoneDelta for the umbrella module docstring.
The raw semidirect calculus on V × C₀ #
The semidirect product on raw pairs (lemma_6_22's convention).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.pmul p q = (p.1 + p.2 • q.1, p.2 * q.2)
Instances For
The semidirect identity.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.pone = (0, 1)
Instances For
The transported product map into Q = Bg/T: jmap (v, cc) = iV(v)·σ(cc).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.jmap DD σ p = (GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.iV DD) (Multiplicative.ofAdd p.1) * σ p.2
Instances For
The pointwise product lift J and the defect atoms #
The pointwise product lift into Bg: J (v, cc) = mV(v)·uσ(cc).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.Jmap S p = ↑(S.mV p.1) * S.uσ p.2
Instances For
The J-defect lands in T.
The J-defect as a T-element.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The three atoms #
The mV-additivity defect mDef v w = mV(v)·mV(w)·mV(v+w)⁻¹ ∈ T.
mDef v w := mV(v)·mV(w)·mV(v+w)⁻¹, the mV-additivity defect.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.mDef DD S v w = ⟨↑(S.mV v) * ↑(S.mV w) * (↑(S.mV (v + w)))⁻¹, ⋯⟩
Instances For
The conjugation defect conjDef cc w = uσ(cc)·mV(w)·uσ(cc)⁻¹·mV(cc•w)⁻¹ ∈ T.
conjDef cc w, the conjugation defect of the sections.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.conjDef DD S hσ cc w = ⟨S.uσ cc * ↑(S.mV w) * (S.uσ cc)⁻¹ * (↑(S.mV (cc • w)))⁻¹, ⋯⟩
Instances For
The uσ-multiplicativity defect uDef cc dd = uσ(cc)·uσ(dd)·uσ(cc·dd)⁻¹ ∈ T — the class
e of Lemma 8.7.
uDef cc dd, the base extension class e at cochain level.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.uDef DD S cc dd = ⟨S.uσ cc * S.uσ dd * (S.uσ (cc * dd))⁻¹, ⋯⟩
Instances For
M commutes with T elementwise (commutation form of M_cent_T).
The product formula: the J-defect is the all-T product
conjDef · uDef · mDef (M abelian, T centralized by M).
↥D.M is commutative (file-local instance — the underlying Mul is definitionally the
subgroup one, so no diamond escapes this leaf).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.commGroupM = { toGroup := inferInstance, mul_comm := ⋯ }
Instances For
The mDef-cocycle identity (the f_cocycle field of the zero-form factor set).
mV(w+w') split through the defect: mV(w+w') = mDef(w,w')⁻¹ · mV w · mV w'.
The conjDef additivity defect (m_quad-shape): conjugating the mV-split by uσ cc.
The conjDef composition law (m_mul-shape): splitting uσ(cc·dd) through uDef.
conjDef at the identity of C₀ is trivial.
conjDef at the zero vector is trivial.
The zero-form factor set of the χ-pushout (design §2) #
The χ-pushout factor-set datum: f_χ := χ ∘ mDef, m_χ := χ ∘ conjDef. Together
with the scalar e_χ := χ ∘ uDef this is the explicit (130)-normal form of the χ-pushout
cover (chiJDef_eq).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
datChi is an equivariant factor-set datum for the zero form.
The ω_χ-decomposition (design §2): the χ-pushforward of the J-defect is the base
cocycle of datChi plus the inflated scalar e_χ = χ ∘ uDef — the explicit (130)-normal
form of the χ-pushout cover.