The Γ_A (83)-coordinates — Z¹⧸B¹ in word generator coordinates #
Route W brick A-1 (docs/orchestration/p16d6e4aA-gammaA-gauss-design.md §2): the e6 Stage-0 bridge
as reusable per-ρ declarations, composed with the banked degree-1 word comparison
(WordCohBridge.h1Equiv) into the generator-coordinate model of the Γ_A Gauss domain:
`h1CoordGammaA : Z¹_{Γ_A,ρ'}(V) ⧸ B¹ → H¹_w (markC θ)` (`θ = ρ.1.1`), bijective,
so A-3 can evaluate the descended Q̄⁰ as an explicit 𝔽₂-function of word-cocycle
classes (Fin 4 → V generator tuples). Contents:
rhoPrimeGA/thetaGA— theGammaA → GAretypes of the two lower maps (the e6 Stage-0 idiom as top-level declarations), withthetaGA_surjectiveand the roundtriproundtripGA; all A-lane objects live uniformly atGA, with ONE defeq-bridge to theGammaA-spelledGaussZResiduestatement at the A-4 finale;coordHcomp_of_hcompat— theh1OfVQuotcompatibility from theθ-compatibility (callers hold the latter asfun _ _ => rflunder thecompHom (thetaGA …)letI-pack, theGaussZFinalper-ρidiom);finite_vcocycle_gammaA—Z¹finiteness, σ-free fromPhase140GammaA.hZcard_gammaA;hfix_of_simple_nt— thehnt-variant ofGaussZReduction.hfix_of_simple:V^{C₀} = 0fromρ'-surjectivity +hsimple+hntalone — theW = ⊤branch contradictshntdirectly, so the NON-block-derivablehfaith(the §9 induction flag) and the[Nontrivial C0]instance are both dropped; the A-lane runs entirely on theprop_8_9ledger hypotheses;h1CoordGammaA+h1CoordGammaA_bijective+card_H1w_gammaA(#H¹_w = #V).
All std-3 (no B-axioms). Consumed by A-3 (the explicit relator quadratic) and A-4 (form
identification + gaussZResidue_gammaA_*); A-2 (the iotaB relator-evaluation rule) is
independent.
The hnt-variant of the fixed-point freeness (generic; drops hfaith) #
V^{C₀} = 0 from the ledger hypotheses alone — the hnt-variant of
GaussZReduction.hfix_of_simple: faithfulness is NOT needed (nor block-derivable — the
the §9 induction coordination flag); in the W = ⊤ branch every C₀-element acts trivially,
contradicting hnt directly.
The per-ρ retypes and the coordinate bijection #
The lower map ρ' : Γ_A → Y_B ⧸ M, retyped against the raw quotient GA (the e6
Stage-0 idiom as a declaration).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.rhoPrimeGA b F En l h ρ = RF.rhoPrime b F (En.radData l h) ⋯ ρ
Instances For
Z¹ is finite — σ-free from the e6 count (Phase140GammaA.hZcard_gammaA).
The boundary-lift head θ = ρ.1.1 : Γ_A → Y_C, retyped against GA — the marking map
of the word complex (markC (thetaGA …)).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionEight.AffineTLift.thetaGA b F ρ = ↑↑ρ
Instances For
The roundtrip rho0 ∘ rhoPrime = θ over GA (rho0_descData_rhoPrime, retyped).
Callers derive the h1OfVQuot-compatibility from their letI-pack through this:
hcomp γ v := congrArg (· • v) (roundtripGA … γ).symm-composed with the compHom-rfl.
The A-1 result: the generator-coordinate model of the Γ_A Gauss domain —
the quotient bijection h1OfVQuot into H¹(Γ_A, V) composed with the banked degree-1
word comparison h1Equiv into H¹_w(markC θ) (classes of Fin 4 → V generator tuples).
The two compatibility hypotheses are the same fact at the two actions the banked pieces
pin (h1OfVQuot: the DescData-internal actVmod; h1Equiv: the ambient Y_C-action):
under the caller's letI-pack (compHom (thetaGA …) + the actVmod re-key) both are
rfl-flavored (hcompat := fun _ _ => rfl; hcomp via roundtripGA).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.