Documentation

Q2Presentation.Induction.TargetDecorationKernelProofs

Target decoration-kernel proof packet #

This sidecar narrows the remaining target-side decoration residual centralCover_targetDecorationKernelData.

Manuscript anchor: §8, lem:decorationblock. The decoration kills R = Phi(K), descends to a C-invariant linear map on the elementary block M = K/R, and then vanishes because (M^vee)^C = 0.

The current subgroup packet knows K/R ≃ M, but it does not expose the conjugation/action compatibility needed to construct the descended decoration map from thetaY. The residual below is exactly that missing compatibility: it supplies the descended block map, proves it is C-invariant, and records its agreement with the original decoration on K.

The narrowed manuscript packet #

Narrow decoration-block compatibility packet.

This is the Lean form of the manuscript proof of lem:decorationblock, before the final vanishing step:

  • the decoration descends from K to a linear map on M = K/R;
  • that map is invariant under the lower quotient action;
  • the descended map agrees with thetaY on elements of K.
Instances For

    The vanishing step from (M^vee)^C = 0 #

    Any C-invariant linear map from the block module M to the elementary decoration module is zero.

    This is the formal content of the last sentence of manuscript lem:decorationblock: a nonzero value in E is detected by a linear functional E -> F_2, contradicting (M^vee)^C = 0.

    Narrow residual replacing centralCover_targetDecorationKernelData.

    It asks for the descended invariant decoration block map and its agreement with thetaY, rather than directly asking for D.Ksub <= thetaY.ker.

    Route-ready proof of the current final decoration-kernel packet from the narrowed manuscript block-map packet.

    The broad canonical framed quotient packet follows without using the old direct decoration-kernel axiom.