The wild kernel centralizes the chief factor (lem:collapse, step (iii)) #
⁅P, L_Y⁆ ≤ S: the descending chain C₀ = P, Cₙ₊₁ = ⁅Cₙ, L_Y⁆ consists of
Y-normal subgroups of P; at each stage the chief dichotomy either drops
Cₙ₊₁ ⊔ S to S — which forces ⁅P, L_Y⁆ ≤ S by the sup decomposition — or keeps
it at P. The chain is dominated by the lower central series of the finite
nilpotent 2-group L_Y, which reaches ⊥; riding the second branch to the end
would force P = S.
This is what makes the Y-action on the chief factor V = P/S factor through the
tame quotient H = Y/L_Y — the input for the coprime steps of lem:collapse and
the "action through a 2-group is trivial" contradiction.
Everything here is proved — no axioms.
The descending commutator chain C₀ = P, Cₙ₊₁ = ⁅Cₙ, L_Y⁆.
Equations
- Q2Presentation.Induction.chiefDescC chief 0 = chief.upper
- Q2Presentation.Induction.chiefDescC chief n.succ = ⁅Q2Presentation.Induction.chiefDescC chief n, p.fst.LY⁆
Instances For
The chain is dominated by the lower central series of L_Y.
The wild kernel centralizes the chief factor: ⁅P, L_Y⁆ ≤ S.