The head-inflated block enrichment (blockEnrichmentD) #
Substrate for the c3-G0 head-inflation reshape (docs/orchestration/p16d6e4aA-p4-tame-package.md,
authoritative; the frozen TamePackage/hpack shape is refuted there). This leaf builds:
- the head identification
headEquiv : Y⧸L_Y ≃* Hand theH-action onV = P/S(headAct, theblockHtameconstruction as data), with the C-headblockPiCH : Y⧸K →* Hand the compatibilityc • v = blockPiCH c • v; - the faithful head quotient
HVq := H ⧸ headActKerwith its descended action (hvAct), faithfulness by construction (hvAct_faithful), and the full projectionblockProjF : Y⧸K →* HVq; - the tame pair
hvSigma/hvTau(classes ofα σ, α τ) with generation and the tame relation, the invariance/simplicity transports, and theH_V-level κ⁰ datumblockDatHV := (kappa0_exists_tame …).choose; blockEnrichmentD—blockEnrichmentwithdat := (blockDatHV).reindexHom blockProjF(definitionally transparent:blockEnrichmentD_dat_eqisrfl), so everyQZero/Q0locevaluation transports downgraphPullback_reindexHom/Q0loc_reindexHomtoC := HVq, where every boundary lift is tame-factored through the fixedmk' ∘ F.alpha(the boundary equation's head component,boundaryLift_head_*),hfaithholds by construction, and the wild slots are literally1;- the boundary-equation head components
boundaryLift_head_gammaA/boundaryLift_head_local(the per-lift tame factorization at the head —rfl-level fromIsBoundaryLift).
Everything here is std-3 (no sorries; kappa0_exists_tame is the proved the §9 induction theorem).
Consumers: P4c (local residue twins at blockEnrichmentD), P4d (Γ_A twins), P4e (the
hypothesis-free G0-obtain), P5 (the ThmFourTwo En-swap).
The head action as data (the blockHtame construction, unpacked) #
The head identification Y ⧸ L_Y ≃* H: π_Y descends with kernel exactly L_Y.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.headEquiv T = MulEquiv.ofBijective (QuotientGroup.lift T.LY T.piY ⋯) ⋯
Instances For
The H-action on V = P/S: the Y⧸L_Y-conjugation action (blockActLY) transported
along headEquiv.symm.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.headAct T Blk = DistribMulAction.compHom (Additive (↥Blk.P ⧸ Blk.S.subgroupOf Blk.P)) (GQ2.SectionNine.headEquiv T).symm.toMonoidHom
Instances For
The C-target's head map Y⧸K →* H (defeq to (blockFrame T Blk hE2).TC.piY).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.blockPiCH T Blk = QuotientGroup.lift Blk.K T.piY ⋯
Instances For
The Y⧸K-action on V is the blockPiCH-pullback of the H-action (the blockHtame
compatibility clause, as a standalone fact).
The faithful head quotient H_V #
The kernel of the H-action on V (the acts-trivially subgroup).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.headActKer T Blk = { carrier := {h : H | ∀ (v : Additive (↥Blk.P ⧸ Blk.S.subgroupOf Blk.P)), h • v = v}, mul_mem' := ⋯, one_mem' := ⋯, inv_mem' := ⋯ }
Instances For
The faithful head quotient H_V := H ⧸ ker(action).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.HVq T Blk = (H ⧸ GQ2.SectionNine.headActKer T Blk)
Instances For
The descended (faithful) H_V-action on V.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Faithfulness by construction: the H_V-action on V is faithful — the hfaith
input of the local residue chain, free at the faithful head quotient.
The full projection Y⧸K →* H_V (head, then faithful quotient).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.blockProjF T Blk = (QuotientGroup.mk' (GQ2.SectionNine.headActKer T Blk)).comp (GQ2.SectionNine.blockPiCH T Blk)
Instances For
The Y⧸K-action on V is the blockProjF-pullback of the faithful H_V-action.
The tame pair in H_V and the transports #
The σ-generator of the tame pair in H_V: the class of α(tameSigma).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.hvSigma T Blk F = (QuotientGroup.mk' (GQ2.SectionNine.headActKer T Blk)) (F.alpha GQ2.tameSigma)
Instances For
The τ-generator of the tame pair in H_V: the class of α(tameTau).
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.hvTau T Blk F = (QuotientGroup.mk' (GQ2.SectionNine.headActKer T Blk)) (F.alpha GQ2.tameTau)
Instances For
H_V is generated by the tame pair (image of gen_ttame_quotient at F.alpha).
The tame relation in H_V (image of tame_relation through α and the quotient).
Invariance of q̄_λ under the faithful H_V-action (transport of blockHinv).
Simplicity of V under the faithful H_V-action (transport of blockHsimple).
The H_V-level κ⁰ datum and the head-inflated enrichment #
The H_V-level κ⁰ existential: Lemma 6.3 (kappa0_exists_tame, proved the §9 induction) at the
faithful head quotient with the tame pair (hvSigma, hvTau).
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
Instances For
The chosen H_V-level base-class datum.
Equations
- GQ2.SectionNine.blockDatHV T Blk F l hlne = ⋯.choose
Instances For
The head-inflated block enrichment (the Γ_A Gauss-sum package): blockEnrichment with the κ⁰
datum replaced by the definitionally-transparent inflation
(blockDatHV …).reindexHom blockProjF of the faithful-head-quotient datum — every other
field (module, action, forms, descent) is blockEnrichment's own. At this enrichment every
QZero/Q0loc evaluation transports down graphPullback_reindexHom to C := H_V, where
every boundary lift is tame-factored through the fixed mk' ∘ F.alpha and hfaith holds
by construction (hvAct_faithful) — see docs/orchestration/p16d6e4aA-p4-tame-package.md.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The boundary equation's head component #
Every boundary lift of either source is tame-factored at the head, through the fixed
F.alpha — the first component of IsBoundaryLift, rfl-deep. This replaces the refuted
per-lift hpack factorizations: composing with mk' (headActKer) gives the H_V-level
factorization through mk' ∘ F.alpha, uniformly in ρ.
Γ_A version: TC.piY ∘ ρ = α ∘ tameA.
Local version: TC.piY ∘ ρ = α ∘ tameF.
The block frame's C-head is blockPiCH (definitional alignment for the consumers).
Paper-tag ledger (auto-generated by paperforge; do not edit) #
- Lemma 6.3 = ⟦lem-basedetclass⟧