2. Introduction and main theorem
Proposition 1.1 of the paper (Marked dyadic Demushkin normalization).
Let D_{\mathrm{loc}}=G_{\Qtwo}(2) and let
\nu_{\mathrm{ur}}:D_{\mathrm{loc}}\twoheadrightarrow\mathbb{Z}_2 be normalized by sending
geometric Frobenius to 1. There exist topological generators a,s,y
such that
D_{\mathrm{loc}}\cong \left\langle a,s,y\;\middle|\;a^2s^4[s,y]=1\right\rangle_{\mathrm{pro}-2}, \qquad \nu_{\mathrm{ur}}(a)=-2,\quad \nu_{\mathrm{ur}}(s)=1,\quad \nu_{\mathrm{ur}}(y)=0.
The proof is given in Sections Subsection 3.1–Subsection 3.3.
Lean code for Proposition2.1●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
GQ2.SectionThree.prop_1_1[complete]
-
GQ2.SectionThree.prop_1_1[complete]
-
theoremdefined in GQ2/PropOneOneAssembly.leancomplete
theorem GQ2.SectionThree.prop_1_1 [CompactSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] (R : GQ2.LocalReciprocity) : ∃ e, (∀ (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), (GQ2.maxProPMk 2 GQ2.AbsGalQ2) g = e.symm GQ2.d0A → R.nu_ur (GQ2.toAb g) = Multiplicative.ofAdd ↑(-2)) ∧ (∀ (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), (GQ2.maxProPMk 2 GQ2.AbsGalQ2) g = e.symm GQ2.d0S → R.nu_ur (GQ2.toAb g) = Multiplicative.ofAdd ↑1) ∧ ∀ (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), (GQ2.maxProPMk 2 GQ2.AbsGalQ2) g = e.symm GQ2.d0Y → R.nu_ur (GQ2.toAb g) = Multiplicative.ofAdd ↑0
theorem GQ2.SectionThree.prop_1_1 [CompactSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] (R : GQ2.LocalReciprocity) : ∃ e, (∀ (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), (GQ2.maxProPMk 2 GQ2.AbsGalQ2) g = e.symm GQ2.d0A → R.nu_ur (GQ2.toAb g) = Multiplicative.ofAdd ↑(-2)) ∧ (∀ (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), (GQ2.maxProPMk 2 GQ2.AbsGalQ2) g = e.symm GQ2.d0S → R.nu_ur (GQ2.toAb g) = Multiplicative.ofAdd ↑1) ∧ ∀ (g : GQ2.AbsGalQ2), (GQ2.maxProPMk 2 GQ2.AbsGalQ2) g = e.symm GQ2.d0Y → R.nu_ur (GQ2.toAb g) = Multiplicative.ofAdd ↑0
**Proposition 1.1.** A marked isomorphism `e : G_{ℚ₂}(2) ≅ D₀` with unramified coordinates `ν_ur(a, s, y) = (−2, 1, 0)`. Assembled from B3c (`orientBundle.equiv`), Lemma 3.5 (`lemma_3_5_marked_abelianization`, using `markedHom_bijective`), and Prop. 3.8 (`prop_3_8_classification`/`prop_3_8_lift`). The statement is placed here to respect the import DAG; see the pointer in `GQ2/SectionThree.lean`.
Proved in §1 of the paper. Ingredients: Proposition 1.5 Lemma 4.4 Lemma 4.7.
-
GQ2.main_presentation_literal[complete] -
GQ2.SectionTen.main_surjection_count'[complete] -
GQ2.main_presentation[complete]
Theorem 1.2 of the paper (Presentation theorem).
The absolute Galois group \GQ is isomorphic to the profinite group topologically generated by
\sigma,\tau,x_0,x_1,
for which the closed normal subgroup generated by x_0,x_1 is pro-2, and which is subject to the two relations
\tau^\sigma=\tau^2
and
h_0u_1^{-1}x_1^\sigma c_0=1,
where the auxiliary words are defined in (1)–(3).
Lean code for Theorem2.2●3 theorems
Associated Lean declarations
-
GQ2.main_presentation_literal[complete]
-
GQ2.SectionTen.main_surjection_count'[complete]
-
GQ2.main_presentation[complete]
-
GQ2.main_presentation_literal[complete] -
GQ2.SectionTen.main_surjection_count'[complete] -
GQ2.main_presentation[complete]
-
theoremdefined in GQ2/PresentationLiteral.leancomplete
theorem GQ2.main_presentation_literal : Nonempty (↑GQ2.GammaA.toProfinite.toTop ≃ₜ* GQ2.AbsGalQ2)
theorem GQ2.main_presentation_literal : Nonempty (↑GQ2.GammaA.toProfinite.toTop ≃ₜ* GQ2.AbsGalQ2)
**Theorem 1.2 (literal presentation form)**: the honest candidate `Γ_A` is continuously isomorphic to `G_{ℚ₂}`. Instantiates `main_presentation` at `Γ_A`: `hΓA := prop_2_3` (the `Γ_A` admissible-marking count), `hcount := SectionTen.main_surjection_count'` (the `G_{ℚ₂}` surjection count), and the topological finite-generation witnesses of `Γ_A` and `G_{ℚ₂}`. -
theoremdefined in GQ2/SectionTenSources.leancomplete
theorem GQ2.SectionTen.main_surjection_count' [CompactSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] (G : Type) [Group G] [Finite G] [TopologicalSpace G] [DiscreteTopology G] : GQ2.contSurjCount G = GQ2.admissibleCount G
theorem GQ2.SectionTen.main_surjection_count' [CompactSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] (G : Type) [Group G] [Finite G] [TopologicalSpace G] [DiscreteTopology G] : GQ2.contSurjCount G = GQ2.admissibleCount G
**Theorem 1.2, surjection-count form** (`GQ2.main_surjection_count`), proved from eq. (154) + Prop 2.3. The original `Statement.lean` placeholder was resolved by the statement-move pattern (Statement is upstream of the tower); the moved statement carries the tower-standing `AbsGalQ2` instance binders.
-
theoremdefined in GQ2/Statement.leancomplete
theorem GQ2.main_presentation (ΓA : Type) [Group ΓA] [TopologicalSpace ΓA] [IsTopologicalGroup ΓA] [CompactSpace ΓA] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace ΓA] [CompactSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] (hfgΓ : ∃ s, (Subgroup.closure ↑s).topologicalClosure = ⊤) (hfgG : ∃ s, (Subgroup.closure ↑s).topologicalClosure = ⊤) (hΓA : ∀ (G : Type) [inst : Group G] [inst_1 : TopologicalSpace G] [DiscreteTopology G] [Finite G], Nat.card (GQ2.ContSurj ΓA G) = GQ2.admissibleCount G) (hcount : ∀ (G : Type) [inst : Group G] [inst_1 : TopologicalSpace G] [inst_2 : DiscreteTopology G] [Finite G], GQ2.contSurjCount G = GQ2.admissibleCount G) : Nonempty (ΓA ≃ₜ* GQ2.AbsGalQ2)
theorem GQ2.main_presentation (ΓA : Type) [Group ΓA] [TopologicalSpace ΓA] [IsTopologicalGroup ΓA] [CompactSpace ΓA] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace ΓA] [CompactSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace GQ2.AbsGalQ2] (hfgΓ : ∃ s, (Subgroup.closure ↑s).topologicalClosure = ⊤) (hfgG : ∃ s, (Subgroup.closure ↑s).topologicalClosure = ⊤) (hΓA : ∀ (G : Type) [inst : Group G] [inst_1 : TopologicalSpace G] [DiscreteTopology G] [Finite G], Nat.card (GQ2.ContSurj ΓA G) = GQ2.admissibleCount G) (hcount : ∀ (G : Type) [inst : Group G] [inst_1 : TopologicalSpace G] [inst_2 : DiscreteTopology G] [Finite G], GQ2.contSurjCount G = GQ2.admissibleCount G) : Nonempty (ΓA ≃ₜ* GQ2.AbsGalQ2)
**Theorem 1.2 (literal presentation form), schematic.** Any candidate profinite group `Γ_A` with the surjection-count property of Prop. 2.3 (the honest one is `GQ2.GammaA`) is continuously isomorphic to `G_{ℚ₂}`. `ΓA` stands in for the presented profinite group; `hΓA` is Prop. 2.3 (its finite quotients are the admissible markings); `hcount` is Theorem 1.2's surjection-count form for `G_{ℚ₂}` (`contSurjCount G = admissibleCount G`, = `SectionTen.main_surjection_count'`; it is a hypothesis here because its proof is downstream of this upstream file); `hfgΓ`/`hfgG` are topological finite generation of `Γ_A` and of `G_{ℚ₂}` (both true — `G_{ℚ₂}` is topologically finitely generated, being the absolute Galois group of a local field). The conclusion is Theorem 1.2.
Proved in §1 of the paper. Ingredients: Lemma 3.2 Lemma 11.1 Proposition 3.1 Theorem 5.1.